• Subscribe To The Reform Party Newsletter
  • View The Reform Party RSS Feed
  • Connect With The Reform Party on LinkedIn
  • Visit The Reform Party Twitter Page
  • Visit The Reform Party YouTube Channel
  • Visit The Reform Party on Tumblr
  • Visit The Reform Party Facebook Page
  • Visit The Reform Party Forums
Reform Party Statement on South Korean-American Trade

Recent reports on South Korean-American trade show that after two years of free trade, American exports to Korea have dropped by three billion dollars. The Reform Party supports renegotiating or repealing this treaty based on the following reasons:

The first reason the Reform Party stands against the South Korean-American trade deal, is that the treaty does not support real free trade. The treaty did succeed in curtailing some barriers and reducing some taxes on imports. It did not however create a free trade environment. For example,  Korean automakers have sold over 800,000 cars and light trucks in the US markets since 2005. American companies have only sold 4,000 automobiles in the Korean market during that time. The American manufactures claim that changing regulations, taxes on engine size and other attempts to reduce the sale of American cars in Korea are to blame.

The second reason that the South Korean-American free trade deal has been unsuccessful is that free trade deals do not help the American economy. Twenty years ago the American government ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico. In 1994, before the passage of NAFTA, the United States had a 1.7 billion dollar trade surplus with Mexico. In 2012 the United States had a trade deficit with Mexico that was valued at 61.4 billion dollars.

When the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) was signed in 2004, the United States had a trade surplus with the five other nations involved with the treaty. Eight years later, in 2013, America had a trade deficit with all five co-signers of the CAFTA treaty.

A third free trade treaty, the less talked about Jordon-United States Free trade treaty, is a third example of how free trade negatively effects the American economy. When the treaty was ratified in 2000, the United States had a trade surplus with the country of Jordan. By 2005, Jordanian textiles exports had risen 20 times their 2000 rates and the country enjoyed a trade surplus with the United States.

The final reason that the Reform Party believes that free trade agreements do not favor the United States is that American’s overall trade has declined since the beginning of free trade deals. Department of Commerce data shows that since the start of free trade agreements with NAFTA in 1992, America’s trade deficit rose from 39.2 billion dollars to 559.8 billion in 2011, or an increase of over 1428 percent.

Based on these findings, the Reform Party of the United States supports the creation of common sense measures that protect the American economy, and reduce the country’s trade deficits. The Reform Party calls on the US government to end free trade agreements, including the free trade agreement with Korea, and create a level playing field for American businesses.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


3 − one =